The PhotoBlocker Spray |
|
The PhotoShield Cover |

|
The Reflector Cover |

|
Beltronics STI Driver |

|
Beltronics Vector 995 |
 |
Cobra XRS-9730 |
 |
Cobra XRS-9930 |
 |
Escort Passport 8500 x50 |
 |
Escort SOLO-2 |
 |
Whistler DE-3500 |
 |
Whistler FUZION |
 |
Whistler PRO 73 |
 |
|
MEDIA CONTACT:
|
Joe Scott
Marketing Director
703.624.9318
joe.scott@phantomplate.com |
| Hi-Resolution Images for Print and Video: |
|

License Plate
with PhotoBlocker™ Spray
and Camera Flash Reflection
Download here |

License Plate
with PhotoBlocker™ Spray
Clear to the Naked Eye
Download here |
| Press FAQs: |
Click on the to expand FAQs for our answers and additional information. |
- How do you know your products work?
Our products were tested independently and
vigorously investigated by Denver Police
department, Fox 31 NEWS, CBS Early Morning
Show South, African Police, Australian Police,
SWEDISH TV, Dutch Police, Channel 9 in Ohio,
KARE 11 in Minnesota, Tech-TV, Washington
Post, Washington Times, LA Times, Wall Street
Journal, New York Post, and many other news
agencies. Additionally, we have sold several hundreds of thousands of cans world wide and the complaint
or product failure is less than 1%. We currently
protect over 2 Million license plates and
possibly saved motorist over 1 billion
dollars in fines.
- Click to watch videos of test results
by police and media
- Click here to read articles, testimonials,
and print news coverage.
- Is it legal?
- Most state laws require your license plate to be visible to the naked eye. They do not, however, require it to be photogenic.
- NOTE: We do recommend that customers check their local motor vehicle code as to the legality of the use and purchase of our products.
- How long have you been in business?
Corporate Info:
PhantomPlate designs and manufactures
passive anti-photo-radar defenses. We have
been in business since 1996. We are based
out of Harrisburg PA. Over the years we
have grown leaps and bounds into the world's
largest manufacturer.
Proven Products:
Our products have been independently tested
and proven by several TV Stations and automotive
magazines. Our independent dealers and distributors
have sold PhotoShield and PhotoBlocker to
tens of thousands of motorists around the
world.
PhantomPlate Inc.
www.phantomplate.com
P.O.BOX 61212
HARRISBURG, PA 17106
EMAIL:
Media Contact : joe.scott@phantomplate.com
Tel.:
703 624 9318
- How many units have you sold?
Our products are sold in 23 countries. We sell our products in
the US, Canada, Europe, Australia, Asia,
South Africa and South America.
The future is bleak for motorists but not
for us.
We expect demand for our products to grow
as more and more cities are implementing
photo enforcement programs. As the number
of cameras deployed increases more and more
unsuspecting motorist will be receiving
tickets in the mail regularly. With fines
ranging from $50 - $650 and the possibility
of increased insurance premium motorist
will be forced to use our products to avoid
overzealous prosecution.
Over the past 20 years motorist around the
world have paid fines in excess of 10 billion
dollars. In 2001 there were 19 cites in
the US that were using traffic cameras.
In 2006 there are 198 and climbing. By 2010
the number of US cities using traffic
cameras will exceed 1000 and millions of
motorist will be victims regularly for going
5-10 miles over the speed limit and/ or
for allegedly running traffic lights that
have unrealistically short yellow light
cycles.
Naturally, demand and use or our e-Book Fight Back “How
To Fight Red Light and Speed Cameras In
Court and Win” will increase.
Additionally, we expect to see sales of
our PhotoBlocker
Spray, PhotoShield
Cover and Reflector
Cover will increase exponentially.
- Click here to read articles on the future
of traffic cameras and PhotoBlocker sales
District expands camera program
Tarron Lively, The Washington Times
- Oct 14, 2005
D.C. officials this weekend will expand
their automated traffic-enforcement
program, even though a record-low percentage
of motorists are speeding through the
District ... Critics of the program
attacked the expansion as the District's
latest effort to reap more revenue from
traffic cameras, which have generated
about $117 million in fines since the
program began in 1999 ...
Arizona
State Appeals Court Photo Radar Decision
Full text of the 1992 Arizona State
Appeals Decision forbidding the mailing
of speed camera tickets.
-
Photo-Enforced
Traffic Fines
The City of Berkeley, California,
is about to give an Australian company
an incentive to maximize traffic
citations. The red-light camera
system will pay the manufacturer
$48 out of every fine extracted
from motorists. The city will get
$161 per ticket.
- Why do people need PhantomPlate products?
- Cameras cause accidents and they do not
save lives. They do not work.
- Virginia DOT Study Shows Cams
Increase Injury Accidents
The Virginia Transportation Research
Council studied all of the state red
light camera programs and found an overall
increase in injury accidents.
A brand new, exhaustive study of
all seven Virginia red light camera
programs shows an overall increase
in injury accidents has occurred where
the devices are installed. The study
was performed by The Virginia Transportation
Research Council at the request of
the state transportation secretary.
The report also notes a fatal flaw
in the Virginia's camera law -- motorists
can ignore any ticket received in
the mail. Only tickets that are personally
served matter (the
same thing happened in Arizona).
Despite a distinct sympathy in favor
of camera enforcement, the researchers
found a "definite" increase
in rear-end accidents and only a "possible"
decrease in angle accidents. Most
importantly, the net effect was that
more injuries happened after cameras
are installed. Camera proponents explain
this away by asserting angle accidents
are more serious, but this claim has
not been scientifically studied according
to this report. The rear end collisions
caused by the cameras still produce
injuries -- the original promise of
camera proponents was that they would
reduce accidents and injuries, not
rearrange them.
This study agrees with long-term
findings in Australia and North
Carolina.
- Do
red light cameras reduce accidents or
generate revenue?
Chicago Tribune
Recently, Mayor Bill White
convinced City Council to approve red
light traffic cameras, ostensibly to
improve safety. However, some of us
think it's more likely a new way to
generate revenue, kind of like $AFEclear.
- Study:
Cameras Increase Fatal Rear End Accidents
(Ontario)
A December 2003 study sponsored
by the Ontario, Canada government finds
increase in accidents and fatal rear-end
collisions from red light camera use.
- Safety
Benefit of Red-Light Cameras in Doubt
I-Newswire.com (press release) - Jun
19, 2005
... The Liverpool report termed this
as "regression to the mean."
The findings of all these reports are
not a surprise to Joe Scott of www.PhotoBlocker.com.
...
- Cameras make mistakes and innocent people
are getting unjust traffic tickets.
- Australia: Camera Fines Man
Driving 88 in a 90km/h Zone
Some 119 Australian motorists have been
ticketed for driving under the speed
limit.
Officials admit that 119 motorists
have received speeding tickets on the
Hume Highway in Victoria, Australia
after speed camera contractor Tenix
input the wrong speed limit into a speed
camera. On July 21, the device was set
up to ticket anyone driving 80 km/h
on a stretch of the road that actually
had a 90km/h speed limit.
Neither the police nor Tenix ever discovered
the error. When Frank Torzillo, 49,
received his fine in the mail for driving
88km/h, he knew he wasn't guilty. He
enlisted the help of former speed camera
operator Graeme Marr to help him prove
his own innocence. Together they discovered
the speed limit discrepancy after visiting
the scene of the "crime."
As a result of their efforts, the government
will be forced to refund nearly A$20,000
to innocent drivers. Tenix has suspended
the camera operator responsible for
the errors.
"I have always stated -- from the
day of my resignation on August 20,
2004 -- about incorrect set-ups, operators
forced to use faulty cameras, and other
incorrect happenings that would cause
motorists to be incorrectly issued with
infringement notices," Marr told
the Herald Sun. "Mr Torzillo's
saga adds to my claims that supervision
is sparse, and [that] operators who
have no feelings for motorists will
set up the speed cameras to raise revenue."
Victoria Premier Steve Bracks has rejected
new calls for an audit of the speed
camera system which last year refunded
A$26 million to motorists who lost their
license from inaccurate speed camera
citations.
"Victoria is Australia's most secretive
state when it comes to speed cameras,"
Shadow Transport Spokesman Terry Mulder
said. "However, Steve Bracks' desire
to be Australia's most money-hungry
leader is no secret."
Source: Speed
camera bungle (Herald Sun (Australia),
8/25/2005)
- UK Officials Admit
Speed Cameras Make Mistakes
Suffolk, UK officials admits to a well-known
camera error.
The officials responsible
for operating speed cameras in Suffolk,
UK have investigated the case of a bus
driver who received a 81 MPH camera
ticket who happened to have an electronic
log recording that proved he was actually
driving 29 MPH at the time. Terry Marsh
with Suffolk SafeCam told the London
Times that, "It is known that it
is possible for a camera to record a
speed inaccurately under sets of very
rare circumstances. I think all camera
operators have been aware of this since
cameras were introduced."
Marsh described the effect of radar
bouncing off large sedans and vans in
the same way that radar bounces off
of the stealth bomber. The reflected
beam can record the speed of a vehicle
traveling in the opposite direction.
Marsh denied that this potential for
error has any effect on the current
system because all tickets are double-checked
by a human. He could not explain why
no such check prevented the ticket from
being issued in the 81 MPH bus case.
Article Excerpt:
Terry Marsh of Suffolk SafeCam admitted
that it was generally known in the industry
that speed cameras could make mistakes,
but insisted that there was no need
for the cameras to be changed as a human
operator usually picked up any anomalies.
Source: Speed
cameras are fallible, operators admit (London Times (UK), 4/12/2005)
Watch Australian news agencies reporting
on traffic camera errors and malfunctions:
Part
1 | Part
2 | Part
3
- The simplest and most effective measure
to reduce red-light running problems is
to length the yellow time cycle.
- Study:
Longer Yellows Reduce Crashes
(Texas Transportation
Institute)
The Texas Transportation Institute shows
that engineering improvements are an
effective alternative to cameras.
The Texas Transportation Institute examined
concerns that red light cameras were
being used by cities that had not first
exhausted available engineering alternatives
such as improving signal timing and
visibility. They studied individual
police accident reports from 181 intersection
approaches across three Texas cities
over three years to determine the most
effective solutions for problem intersections.The
study found that improving signal visibility
reduced violations 25 percent. Other
changes could net between 18 and 48
percent reductions. Yet they found when
the yellow signal was 1 second shorter
than what the standard ITE timing formula
specifies as a minimum, red light violations
jumped 110%. Adding an additional second
to the ITE minimum yellow yielded 53%
reduction in violations, producing the
greatest benefit of all the factors
studied (2-6). When safety is the main
concern, preventing crashes is more
important than reducing violations.
Yellow signal timing again proved most
effective in reducing crashes. An extra
second yielded a 40 percent collision
reduction.The study also found that
the vast majority of red light camera
tickets are issued within the first
second a light is red -- in fact, the
average ticket is issued when the light
has been red for half a second or less.
Yet right-angle crashes, which account
for the majority of red-light related
collisions, "with one exception, all
of the right-angle crashes occurred
after 5 seconds or more of red" (5-16).
In other words, tickets are being issued
primarily for split-second violations
where collisions are not occurring.
- Red Light Citations
Drop Below One Per Day
Increasing Yellow Light Time at Fairfax
Red Light Camera Intersection Results
in 94 percent Drop in "Red Light
Violations."
Eric Skrum, Communications Director
for the National Motorists Association
said, "Records from Fairfax County
show that increasing the time of yellow
lights significantly decreases the
number of red light violations. The
Virginia Department of Transportation
increased the yellow time on the traffic
lights at US50 and Fair Ridge Drive
by 1.50 seconds on March 26, 2001.
This increase in yellow time from
4.00 seconds to 5.50 seconds resulted
in a 94 percent drop in citations,
less than one per day, at this red
light camera enforced location."
Skrum continued, "Fairfax County
records show that 'events,' red light
violations, captured by the camera
fell from an average daily rate of
52.1 per day before the yellow time
increase to just 2 per day afterwards,
a reduction of 94 percent.
"Fairfax County records also
show that citations being issued dropped
to just 0.82 citations a day on average
during the 67 days after the yellow
time was increased.
"This camera was activated February
8, 2001 by Lockheed Martin under an
agreement with Fairfax County. The
Virginia Department of Transportation
is responsible for operating these
signals. The decision to install a
red light camera at this intersection
confirms that this intersection was
considered a location of serious violations
with increased potential for accidents.
"This experience should prove
to any skeptic that sound engineering
practices, not only work, but are
preferable to exploiting motorists
through the use of ticket cameras
and related automated enforcement
devices," Skrum concluded.
Fairfax County red light camera enforcement
records were received from Fairfax
County on July 9, 2001 by the National
Motorists Association. Those records
reflected camera enforcement data
through the end of May, 2001 and were
the most current and complete records
available on the day of receipt (as
stated by Fairfax County officials).
It should also be noted that the average
daily traffic in this intersection
is approximately 74,000 vehicles per
day.
Click here to read official report on
red-light cameras and accidents.
Watch a WBAL 11 (Baltimore, MD) report
on the city shortening yellow-light
times to trap motorists.
Watch a real traffic camera footage
ticketing the wrong motorist for a $350
ticket.
- Cameras primary goal is to raise revenue
and safety is a smoke screen.
We would like to stress that we
do not condone nor encourage running red
lights or speeding. Running red lights is
careless, illegal and outright dangerous.
Please read the following
articles that support our findings and justify
why people should protect themselves from
prying eyes.
Click
here to read full coverage on The Weekly
Standard
- Click here to read news articles, press
releases, and exposes traffic cameras.
New invention helps motorists use PhotoBlocker
Spray to fight unjust traffic tickets.
Red light and speed cameras have met
their match
PhotoBlocker Spray Press Release -
Hate the idea of impersonal cameras
ticketing you for driving 36 miles per
hour (mph) in a 25mph zone or for running
a red light that was only yellow for
a split second? The antidote is in a
red aerosol can known as PhotoBlocker
Spray.
Red-Light, Speed Cameras, and Tickets:
Billion Dollar Business
David Bresnahan, NewsWithViews.com -
Mar 03, 2006
If we all use this spray on our license
plates maybe then the politicians will
get the message and do what is right
-- junk the cameras and lengthen the
time of the yellow lights.
Man
Loses Job Over False Speed Camera Ticket
... Could Have Been Prevented
Free-Press-Release.com (press release)
- Jun 27, 2005
... The company's web site at www.PhotoBlocker.com
provides testimonials, as well as full
details about the product and the need
for marketing affiliates to help ...
Speed Cameras Do Not Make Roads Safer,
New Study
Xtvworld (press release), India - Jun
16, 2005
... The company's web site at www.PhotoBlocker.com
provides full details about the product
and the need for Internet marketing
affiliates to help get it to more ...
Safety Benefit of Red-Light Cameras
in Doubt
I-Newswire.com (press release) - Jun
19, 2005
... The Liverpool report termed this
as "regression to the mean."
The findings of all these reports are
not a surprise to Joe Scott of www.PhotoBlocker.com.
...
- Are there any PhantomPlate dealers/customers
available to contact in my area?
We can provide you with customers and dealers
in your city upon your request. Please email
us at joe.scott@phantomplate.com or call 703-624-9318. We will contact customers
and dealers in your area and get their consent
to be interviewed and/or contacted by you.
- Are you encouraging people to run
red-lights or speed recklessly and get away
with it?
We would like to stress that we do not
condone nor encourage running red lights
or speeding. Running red lights is careless,
illegal and outright dangerous. Note: In some states it is unlawful to display on any vehicle a registration plate which is obscured in any manner which inhibits the proper operation of an automated red light enforcement system.
- Other products you are working on
...
|
|
|
|
NOTE: The manufacturer and retailer assume no responsibility for any use or application of this product in violation of any applicable law.
Before installing this product, please check your state and local laws and regulations.
In some states it is unlawful to display on any vehicle a registration plate
which is obscured in any manner which inhibits the proper operation of
an automated red light enforcement system.
|
|